<progress id="7lt7M"><ruby id="7lt7M"></ruby></progress>
<menuitem id="7lt7M"><dl id="7lt7M"></dl></menuitem><listing id="7lt7M"><ins id="7lt7M"><noframes id="7lt7M"><thead id="7lt7M"></thead><listing id="7lt7M"></listing><thead id="7lt7M"></thead>
<thead id="7lt7M"></thead>
<thead id="7lt7M"></thead>

Why Nuclear Plants are a safe zone from terrorist attacks

Nuclear power plant

Possible aircraft attack

There has been a lot of contemplation over the consequences of occurrence of an attack by a large aircraft similar to the 2001 World Trade Centre attack in New York. This time the target being a nuclear facility aiming at radioactive materials. Studies show that nuclear reactors would be robust as compared to any other civil installations used to resist such attacks. A thorough study financed by the US department of Energy and conducted by US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) concluded that the US reactor would be strong enough to withstand attacks from large commercial aircraft.


Lack of Australian nuclear plant almost immoral: Peter Cosgrove

The Former defence force chief Peter Cosgrove has pleaded for Australia to embrace nuclear power, criticising the “daily scrapping” between politicians about climate change.

Addressing a business breakfast in Perth, General Cosgrove said strong action was crucial and it was “almost immoral” to export uranium to less technologically advanced and stable countries to use in nuclear power plants while refusing to have one in Australia: (more…)

Warming to Nuclear Power

The Age yesterday released an Age/Nielsen poll demonstrating that 49% of Australians believed nuclear should be on the nation’s list of potential power options, with 43% opposed.


This is a major change from a level of just 38% in a 2006 Newspoll, with 51 per cent opposed.


The Real Target is 97%

With all the political talk about emissions targets, it is hard to get a solid reference point.? Here is one such reference.? Taking?the?long term sustainable emissions level from the?Stern Review (UK?Government 2007), we find that a 97% emissions cut will ultimately be?required in Australia’s case.


亚博体育独家预判球赛| 亚博体育下载appios| 亚博可以提现| 亚博足彩iso| 亚博体育需要完成流水| 亚博体育app苹果下载软件| 亚博体育提现能到账| 亚博AG下载| 亚博体育扣费| 亚博体育能买2串一个| 亚博体育取款到账| 亚博体育招聘| 亚博流水提现要求| 亚博体育ios下载地址| 克雷斯波亚博| 亚博彩票苹果版| 亚博体育群爆| 亚博手机网站| 亚博体育送奖品可靠| 亚博体育亚洲官网| 亚博体育在线投注| 亚博体育APP官网下载| 亚博ios| 亚博体育提款流水规则| 亚博彩票app下载| 亚博国际APP下载安卓| 亚博体育这个app买足彩| 亚博体育的可靠信| 亚博体育苹果app| 亚博中心钱包| 亚博体育安卓版| 亚博赞助阿根廷| 亚博app苹果版| 亚博体育app软件苹果版| 万博和亚博体育哪个好| 亚博体育如果提现| 亚博体育app官网| 亚博体育提现快| 亚博体育几倍流水| 亚博多久到账| 亚博体育器材| http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc1GzEw/35344.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccgpXtl/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccCHRl2/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccnOLc1/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccclApE/40556.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc76dH2/88448.html